Loading
Please wait while we prepare the content for you...
12 sample questions from the SPL Foundation League — with correct answers and explanations. No sign-up required.
Unlike Voc and Pmax which decrease with temperature, the Short Circuit Current (Isc) of a solar module slightly increases with temperature. What is the typical temperature coefficient for Isc?
The SPL Foundation League has 5 levels, a live timer, and a national leaderboard. Free to join.
Start Foundation LeagueExplanation
Isc has a positive temperature coefficient of approximately +0.04% to +0.06%/°C. This is because higher temperature increases the number of thermally generated minority carriers and broadens the absorption spectrum slightly. However, this small Isc increase does not compensate for the larger Voc decrease (-0.3%/°C) and fill factor decrease, resulting in a net power loss with temperature. The practical implication: on hot days, slightly more current flows but at a lower voltage, with the net effect being lower power.
An IV curve tracer measurements on a 10-module string shows a smooth curve with two distinct 'steps' or plateaus (a 'staircase' shape). What does this indicate about the string?
Explanation
A staircase IV curve with multiple steps indicates partial shading affecting specific modules or groups of cells within the string. Each step corresponds to a bypass diode activating on a shaded module or cell group, creating discrete voltage steps in the IV curve. If a string has 10 modules each with 3 bypass diodes, a staircase curve with 2–4 steps suggests 2–4 bypass diode sections are conducting, meaning shading affects approximately 1–2 modules. This diagnosis guides maintenance teams to identify and remove the shading obstruction (tree, bird dropping, antenna) rather than replacing modules.
PID (Potential Induced Degradation) in solar modules is primarily caused by which of the following?
Explanation
PID occurs when high voltage potential differences between the solar cells and the grounded module frame cause ion migration within the module, leading to power degradation. It is especially severe in systems where the negative string is at high potential relative to earth (common in ungrounded or positively-grounded inverter systems), and in hot, humid conditions like coastal India. PID-resistant modules use anti-PID glass coating and EVA encapsulant formulations.
An HJT module (Pmax temp coefficient -0.25%/°C) and a TOPCon module (-0.30%/°C) are both rated at 580W STC. At a Gujarat desert site where module temperature reaches 72°C in summer, calculate the power output of each at that temperature and determine which delivers more energy on a hot summer day with 7 peak sun hours.
Explanation
Temperature delta from STC: 72°C - 25°C = 47°C. HJT at 72°C: 580 × [1 - (0.25/100) × 47] = 580 × [1 - 0.1175] = 580 × 0.8825 = 511.9W. TOPCon at 72°C: 580 × [1 - (0.30/100) × 47] = 580 × [1 - 0.141] = 580 × 0.859 = 498.2W. HJT advantage per module: 511.9 - 498.2 = 13.7W. Daily energy from HJT: 511.9W × 7h = 3,583 Wh. Daily energy from TOPCon: 498.2W × 7h = 3,487 Wh. HJT daily advantage: 96 Wh/module/day. For a 10 MW project (≈17,241 modules at 580W), HJT generates 1,655 kWh more daily during peak summer. Over 60 peak summer days, that is approximately 99,300 kWh ≈ 100 MWh extra. At ₹4/kWh PPA this is ₹4 lakh additional revenue in one summer season. HJT's superior temperature coefficient makes it the preferred technology for Rajasthan, Gujarat, and other high-irradiance, high-temperature Indian states.
A bifacial module with bifaciality factor φ = 0.72 is mounted 1 m above sandy ground with albedo ρ = 0.25. The view factor from the rear of the module to the ground is 0.55. Front-side GHI is 900 W/m². What is the approximate total effective irradiance for bifacial energy yield calculation?
Explanation
Rear irradiance reaching the module = ρ × VF × G_front = 0.25 × 0.55 × 900 = 123.75 W/m². Effective rear contribution = φ × rear irradiance = 0.72 × 123.75 = 89.1 W/m². Total effective irradiance = 900 + 89.1 ≈ 989 W/m². The bifaciality factor accounts for rear cells being slightly less efficient than front cells. This calculation methodology is used in energy yield simulation tools such as PVsyst.
A coastal solar plant in Chennai is experiencing rapid power degradation across all modules within the first year. The EPC engineer suspects PID. Which of the following measures would most effectively prevent PID?
Explanation
PID prevention requires breaking the high-voltage path between cells and the grounded frame. The most effective measures are: (1) Using PID-resistant modules (special EVA + anti-PID coated glass), (2) Installing a PID prevention box that biases the string negative terminal to slightly positive potential relative to earth, (3) Using a transformer-isolated inverter which breaks the galvanic path between string and earth. For coastal Chennai, PID risk is high due to high humidity accelerating ion migration. Regular night-time PID recovery using the prevention box helps reverse early-stage PID.
A project datasheet comparison shows: TOPCon bifaciality factor 83%, PERC bifaciality factor 68%. In a fixed-tilt ground-mounted system in Madhya Pradesh with albedo 0.22 and rear irradiance factor 0.14, what is the approximate annual rear-side energy gain difference per kWp of installed capacity (assuming front POA = 1,750 kWh/kWp/yr)?
Explanation
Rear-side irradiance reaching the module = Front POA × rear irradiance factor × albedo = 1,750 × 0.14 × 0.22 = 53.9 kWh/kWp/yr (normalised to front capacity). TOPCon rear yield: 53.9 × 0.83 = 44.7 kWh/kWp/yr. PERC rear yield: 53.9 × 0.68 = 36.7 kWh/kWp/yr. Difference: 44.7 - 36.7 = 8.0 kWh/kWp/yr more from TOPCon bifaciality. For a 100 MW project, this represents 100,000 kWp × 8.0 = 800,000 kWh = 800 MWh/yr additional from TOPCon's superior bifaciality alone. Combined with better temperature coefficient and lower degradation, the total annual generation advantage of TOPCon over PERC in MP climate conditions typically amounts to 2-3% higher specific yield (kWh/kWp). This gap has made bifacial TOPCon the dominant technology selected in SECI and state utility tenders since 2024, displacing bifacial PERC which had been standard since 2021.
A solar module has a NOCT (Nominal Operating Cell Temperature) of 44°C. On a day with 800 W/m² irradiance and an ambient temperature of 35°C, what is the estimated cell temperature?
Explanation
Cell temperature can be estimated using: Tcell = Tambient + [(NOCT - 20) / 800] × G. Where G = irradiance in W/m². Tcell = 35 + [(44 - 20) / 800] × 800 = 35 + 24 = 59°C. At 59°C (34°C above STC of 25°C) with Pmax temp coefficient of -0.35%/°C, the power loss = 34 × 0.35% = 11.9%. This is a significant loss on a typical hot Indian afternoon and explains why yield estimates must account for temperature derating.
In a TOPCon cell, the ultra-thin tunnel oxide layer (1.5-2.0 nm SiO2) performs two simultaneous functions that are essential to its efficiency advantage over PERC. What are these two functions?
Explanation
The tunnel oxide in TOPCon is a thermally grown silicon dioxide layer just 1.5-2.0 nm thick — a few atomic layers. This thickness is critical because it enables two opposing yet complementary behaviours. First, surface passivation: the SiO2 saturates dangling bonds at the silicon surface, reducing the interface defect density (Dit) dramatically. These dangling bonds are recombination centres that reduce open-circuit voltage (Voc). By passivating them, Voc can reach 720-740 mV in TOPCon vs 680-700 mV in PERC. Second, carrier selectivity via quantum tunnelling: the oxide is thin enough that majority carriers (electrons in n-type) can quantum-mechanically tunnel through the oxide to reach the doped polysilicon contact above, while simultaneously blocking minority carriers (holes) from recombining at the metal contact. This selective transport — the defining feature of a passivating contact — is what makes TOPCon fundamentally different from PERC's localised back surface field (BSF) architecture. The polysilicon layer above the oxide is then heavily doped to form a conductive lateral transport path.
TOPCon solar cells use an n-type crystalline silicon base instead of the p-type base in PERC cells. Which statement BEST explains why n-type TOPCon cells exhibit zero Light-Induced Degradation (LID)?
Explanation
Light-Induced Degradation (LID) in p-type silicon cells is caused by boron-oxygen (B-O) defect complexes. When boron-doped silicon is illuminated, trace oxygen atoms in the lattice react with substitutional boron to create recombination-active defect centres, reducing minority carrier lifetime and dropping Voc by 1-3% in the first hours of outdoor exposure. TOPCon cells use phosphorus-doped n-type silicon as the base. Since n-type silicon contains phosphorus rather than boron, the B-O complex simply cannot form — there is no boron available to partner with oxygen. This structural difference makes n-type TOPCon inherently immune to LID. In Indian conditions, new PERC modules typically lose 1.5-2% in the first weeks outdoors, while TOPCon delivers output closer to its rated STC value from day one. Combined with TOPCon's lower annual degradation warranty (≤0.4%/yr vs PERC's ≤0.55%/yr), the 25-year cumulative energy advantage of TOPCon over PERC can exceed 4-5% in total generation — a significant bankability differentiator for large Indian utility projects.
When connecting solar modules in a string, cell mismatch losses occur. What is the main cause and how do module manufacturers reduce this?
Explanation
Cell mismatch occurs because individual cells within and across modules have slightly different electrical characteristics (Isc, Voc) due to manufacturing tolerances. In a series string, current is limited to the weakest cell, so variations reduce overall string output. Manufacturers reduce mismatch by binning (sorting) cells into narrow Isc/Voc tolerance bands (±3%) before assembly. Power tolerance labels (e.g., 400W +5%/-0%) indicate that all modules in a positive-tolerance bin will perform at or above rated power, minimising string mismatch.
HJT (Heterojunction Technology) cells achieve 23-25% efficiency by depositing thin amorphous silicon layers on both sides of a crystalline silicon wafer. What is the primary efficiency mechanism that amorphous silicon provides in this structure?
Explanation
HJT cells use intrinsic (undoped) amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) layers on both surfaces of an n-type crystalline silicon wafer, followed by doped a-Si:H layers for carrier selectivity. The intrinsic a-Si:H layers are the key: they provide exceptional surface passivation with interface recombination velocity below 1 cm/s, which is among the lowest achievable with any passivation technology. This outstanding passivation raises open-circuit voltage (Voc) to 730-750 mV — the highest of any commercial silicon technology. The amorphous silicon also acts as a wide-bandgap window layer: its bandgap (~1.7 eV) vs crystalline silicon (1.1 eV) creates a heterojunction barrier that provides carrier selectivity without the need for heavily doped diffused regions. This avoids Auger recombination losses from heavy doping, further boosting efficiency. The cell is processed entirely at temperatures below 200°C (vs 900°C+ for diffused PERC/TOPCon junctions), which also avoids hydrogen effusion from passivation layers — a major advantage for maintaining passivation quality over the module lifetime.